Scoring Content Sources
Some articles hit the mark. Others just take up space. Scoring is how you tell Ongage Studio which content signals to trust — and which to quietly move aside.
Whether you're building a Data Streams for deep-dive finance insights or faith-driven parenting advice, source scoring is your tuning fork. It helps you boost credibility, filter fluff, and shape your Agent’s research before a single word gets written.
Why Source Scoring Matters
Data Streams don’t just scan — they judge. But not all sources deserve the same weight. Your scoring tells Studio:
- Prioritize trusted or high-quality journalism
- Penalize low-authority or sensationalist publishers
- Completely exclude domains that conflict with your standards
- Fine-tune tone by elevating sources with a specific editorial voice
- Avoid duplicate, aggregated, or AI-generated content
By tuning your Source Scores, you control the quality and tone of everything your Agents create.
How Scoring Works
Scoring happens inside the Data Streams metadata filters. You’ll find four levels of control:
Filter | What It Does |
---|---|
Included Sources | Only these sources are allowed — all others are ignored |
Boosted Sources | These get a numerical score boost (0–1000) — higher means stronger visibility |
Penalized Sources | These still appear, but with lower ranking (–1 to –1000) |
Excluded Sources | These are fully blocked — they’ll never appear in results |
The more refined your filters, the more refined your output.
Example Use Cases
Goal | Scoring Strategy |
---|---|
Prioritize expert journalism | Boost: Reuters (900), WSJ (850), NYT (800) |
Downplay low-quality aggregators | Penalize: Patch (–700), Medium (–500), BuzzFeed (–800) |
Block politically biased coverage | Exclude: Breitbart, HuffPost, The Nation |
Highlight niche expertise | Include: Stateline, Pew Research, Local trade journals |
Avoid commercial content | Exclude: Sponsored blogs, affiliate sites, advertorials |
Actions You Can Apply
Action | Behavior |
---|---|
Boost Source | Elevates articles from that source. Use a score of +600 to +1000. |
Penalize Source | Lowers articles in rank without fully removing them. Use –400 to –1000. |
Exclude Source | Completely blocks all articles from that source. |
Include Source | Limits the Stream to this list only. Use with caution — very restrictive. |
When to Boost, Penalize, or Exclude
Boost Sources
Use this when you want to favor articles from respected, well-aligned publishers. Ideal for surfacing deeper analysis, consistent tone, or trusted reporting.
Examples:
+900
→ Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Pew Research+800
→ Desiring God, Harvard Health, Financial Times+700
→ The Athletic, Cleveland Clinic, Stateline
Penalize Sources
Apply a soft filter when the outlet sometimes delivers value but often misaligns with your standards. Penalized content is still possible, just less likely.
Examples:
–700
→ BuzzFeed, Barstool Sports, Medium–600
→ Wellness blogs, Fan blogs, Patch–500
→ Aggregators, Reddit, anonymous forums
Exclude Sources
Block sources entirely when they consistently misalign with your brand’s tone, credibility threshold, or audience trust.
Examples:
- Exclude → TMZ, Goop, The Onion, Daily Mail
- Exclude → FanDuel Blog, CoinDesk, Distractify
- Exclude → Satirical, tabloid, or heavily partisan domains
Tips for Source Scoring
- Use boosts sparingly — a few highly trusted sources go a long way
- Start with penalties before excluding unless the source is a hard no
- Avoid over-filtering — if you exclude too many sources, your Stream may return few or no results
- Balance source scoring with item filters for nuanced control
- Group your source filters under clearly named filter groups like:
Boosted Sources
Penalized Sources
Excluded Sources
Trusted Only Sources
(if using Include logic)
Use Case Example: Health & Wellness
Source Name | Action | Score | Why |
---|---|---|---|
Cleveland Clinic | Boost | +800 | Authoritative medical resource |
Wellness blogs | Penalize | –600 | Often anecdotal or unverified |
BuzzFeed | Penalize | –700 | Tone mismatch and frequent clickbait |
Goop | Exclude | — | Not aligned with evidence-based health content |
Mayo Clinic | Include | — | Use as sole source for high-trust expert guidance |
Summary
Source scoring lets you go beyond topical relevance and enforce editorial standards, tone, and authority within your Data Streams. Whether you want hard news, medical credibility, spiritual depth, or brand-safe entertainment, fine-tuning your sources ensures your Agents always start with the right foundation.